Preparing IRS Form 433-F: from client records to a reviewable draft

Which records should the team gather?

Start with the client's intake information and the financial records relevant to the collection period. Depending on the case, these may include bank statements, pay stubs, Social Security statements, and expense records. Check that documents belong to the right taxpayer and period, and ask for missing information before relying on a draft. The exact records needed depend on the client's circumstances; this is not an exhaustive IRS checklist.

For the fields and instructions required by the agency, consult the current IRS Form 433-F, Collection Information Statement (including its instructions). The IRS form, not this guide, is the source for official requirements.

What does Rima prepare?

Rima's document automation reads uploaded financial source documents, extracts relevant values, and maps them to a 433-F draft. It flags missing or inconsistent information for a reviewer. Preparation is not approval: the draft is a starting point for professional review, not a determination of eligibility or a filing with the IRS.

Scans may be unreadable, records may be incomplete, and extracted values may be wrong or mapped to the wrong period. A reviewer must correct those issues rather than assume the draft is complete.

How should a practitioner review the draft?

1. Confirm the case context. Check the client, reporting period, and documents used.
2. Verify the numbers. Compare proposed amounts with the source pages and resolve unexplained transactions or mismatched periods.
3. Resolve flags. Request missing records, correct entries, and assess any relevant standards in light of the client's facts.
4. Approve the final work. The responsible practitioner reviews the completed form and decides what, if anything, is submitted.

Watch the 433-F workflow demonstration to see the preparation and review checkpoints.

What result has been documented?

Across resolution firms using Rima, Rima reports that 433-F preparation time has moved from about 90 minutes to 30 minutes—a 67% reduction when rounded. The linked 433-F preparation case study describes one firm, not the full multi-firm measurement. These are reported preparation times, not a promise for every firm, case, or form. Review time and case complexity still matter.

Questions before using Rima?

For current answers about integrations, setup, pricing, and security, see the frequently asked questions and security page. Discuss your firm's specific tools and onboarding requirements during a demo rather than assuming a native integration or a fixed implementation timeline.